Back to return-it.ca
5. Environmental Impact

Section 5 Environmental Impact

  • Detailed report on the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, energy savings and CO2 equivalent reduced from recycling.
  • End Fate report for aluminum, plastic, glass, polycoat and other materials.

5.1 Environmental Report

The Government of British Columbia has adopted public policies intended to promote a low-carbon economy. As a stewardship agency operating under a provincial regulation, Encorp compiles applicable data, and analyzes and reports on the impacts of its stewardship activities.

In 2020, Encorp recycled 89,976 metric tonnes of used beverage containers. The energy saved through the recycling of these materials has been converted into tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e), the common measure of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, based on the US Environmental Protection Agency’s Waste Reduction Model (WARM). The avoided emissions published in this report were calculated using the WARM version 13 [06/14] (Refer to End Fate table in Section 5.2).

In total, Encorp’s activities in 2020 contributed to the reduction of about 105.5 thousand tonnes of CO2e being released into the atmosphere, compared to 104.8 thousand tonnes in 2019. The higher CO2e reduction is primarily attributed to the increase in the volume of aluminum containers, which contributes to higher emission savings by recycling.

While recycling has an overall net benefit in terms of energy and emissions savings, the recycling process itself requires energy and thus has GHG emissions associated with it. When estimating net savings, Encorp calculates the GHG emissions specifically associated with its stewardship activities.

Since Encorp is not a manufacturing company, the majority of our associated GHG emissions come as a result of transporting materials as well as heating and powering our network of facilities. The calculation of GHG emissions is based on the following methodology. Encorp transitioned its 2020 GHG emission calculation to Climate Smart certified methodology; therefore, 2019 calculations are restated for comparison.

Methodology

As a Climate Smart certified business, Encorp conducted its GHG emissions inventory according to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, Revised Edition. The GHG Protocol is an internationally recognized standard published by the World Resources Institute and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development.

Organizational Boundaries

Encorp used the operational control approach to determine its organizational boundary and included in its inventory all operations over which it has operational control. The following facilities were included in Encorp’s inventory:

The utility activities below were included in Scope 3 due to lack of operational control, as these facilities are operated by Encorp’s vendors.

Inventory Boundaries

The GHG Protocol requires the inclusion of Scope 1 and 2 emissions, and suggests including Scope 3 emissions from activities relevant to an organization’s business and goals, and for which reliable data can be obtained. Encorp included emissions from the following activities under Scopes 1, 2 and 3:

Scope 1: includes direct GHG emissions from sources that are owned or controlled by the reporting company or organization

Scope 2: includes indirect GHG emissions from purchased electricity and purchased heat

Scope 3: includes indirect GHG emissions that are consequences of the reporting company’s operations, but occur at sources owned by another company

Scope 3 emissions from waste were excluded from the inventory due to lack of available data. Emissions from waste are likely immaterial compared to Encorp’s total inventory.

Emission Factors

This inventory was conducted using the emissions factors from the Climate Smart web-based greenhouse gas management tool. The Climate Smart GHG management tool was designed for adherence to the GHG Protocol. Climate Smart’s emission factors come from a variety of sources, such as Environment Canada, the GHG Protocol Initiative, the US Environmental Protection Agency and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Smart reviews its emission factors annually to update them based on refined industry methodology and changing electricity grids.

Scope 1
Scope 1 emissions totalled 45.44 tCO2e in Encorp’s 2020 calendar year, down by 8% since baseline year.

Slide the table left and right. (Scroll bar is below table.)
Activity Baseline
2019 (tCO2e)
CY 2020
(tCO2e)
Absolute
Change (tCO2e)
% Change Justifications &
Additional Notes
Scope 1
Heat 49.29 45.44 -3.85 -8% Estimated consumption unchanged. Decrease in emissions due to change in heating intensity factor.
Grand Total 49.29 45.44 -3.85 -8%  


Scope 2
Scope 2 emissions totalled 2.86 tCO2e in Encorp’s 2020 calendar year, up by 21% since baseline year.

Slide the table left and right. (Scroll bar is below table.)
Activity Baseline
2019 (tCO2e)
CY 2020
(tCO2e)
Absolute
Change (tCO2e)
% Change Justifications &
Additional Notes
Scope 2
Electricity 2.36 2.86 0.50 21% Estimated consumption unchanged. Increase in emissions due to change in electricity emissions factor.
Grand Total 2.36 2.86 0.50 21%  

Scope 3
Scope 3 emissions totalled 11,287.9 tCO2e in Encorp’s 2020 calendar year, down by 4% since baseline year.

Slide the table left and right. (Scroll bar is below table.)
Activity Baseline
2019 (tCO2e)
CY 2020
(tCO2e)
Absolute
Change (tCO2e)
% Change Justifications &
Additional Notes
Scope 3
Electricity 61.80 67.40 5.60 9% Due to the variability of data
Equipment 436.31 440.57 4.26 1%  
Heat 3,485.21 2,712.40 -772.80 -22% Due to the variability of data
Paper
Consumption
69.975 58.167 -11.81 -17%  
Staff
Commuting
29.16 29.59 0 n/a Same as 2019
Transporting
Goods – Rail
356.12 425.76 69.64 20%  
Transporting
Goods – Road
6,563.90 7,377.15 813.25 12% Due to overall higher volume and weight moved
Transporting
Goods – Water
675.32 125.18 -550.14 -81% Due to less weight being shipped to ICF Global
Transporting
People – Air
19.78 3.95 -15.83 -80% As a result of pandemic
Transporting
People – Road
44.85 47.64 2.79 6%  
Transporting
People – Water
0.67 0.10 -0.57 -84%  
Grand Total 11,743.07 11,287.9 -455.2 -4%  

5.2 Container Recycling End Fate Report

All containers collected by Encorp in 2020 were shipped to recyclers for further processing into new material in accordance with Section 8 of the Recycling Regulation.


Slide the table left and right. (Scroll bar is below table.) (Scroll bar is below table.)
Material Type Fate of Material
(2020)
Containers Sold (% of total) Recovery % (by weight) Energy savings Weight diverted from landfill (mt) Tonnes CO2 reduced
Aluminum Aluminum cans collected were sold and shipped to a re-melt facility in the US and turned back into sheet stock for new cans.

Video:
Aluminum Can Recycling Process
38.61% 82.80% 93% 5,922 59,712
Plastic Plastic containers were sold to Merlin Plastics and shipped to their two separate facilities in BC and Alberta to be cleaned and pelletized to become new raw material for manufacturers of various plastic products, including new containers, strapping material and fibres.

Video:
Plastic Bottle Recycling Process
37.27% 71.50% 86% 10,004 11,873
Glass Glass containers were processed in British Columbia and shipped to a manufacturing plant that produces fibreglass insulation in Alberta; a facility that produces new glass bottles in Seattle, Washington, US; a facility that manufactures sandblasting materials in Quesnel, BC; and municipal sites that use crushed glass as construction aggregates.

Video:
Glass Bottle Recycling Process
15.74% 86.40% 34% 71,830 24,976
Polycoat Polycoat containers collected were sold to ICF International and shipped to manufacturing plants in South Korea, Thailand and Japan for material recovery and production of tissue paper from the recovered fibre. Encorp also shipped polycoat containers to a second supplier, Continuus Material Recovery. Continuus Material Recovery receives drink box containers at their facility in Des Moines, Iowa, where they produce building boards that are used as an alternative to traditional wallboards, roofing, floor underlayment, ceiling tiles and structured insulated panels.

Video:
Gable Top Cartons and Drink Box Recycling Process
7.14% 60.90% 53% 1,505 7,964
Pouches Encorp has found a viable end market through TerraCycle in New Jersey, who is using this material to make various products such as composite decking, buckets, storage totes, and non-food-grade containers and trays. 0.65% 25.40% 53% 13 14
Bag-In-Box The plastic bladders inside the Bag-In-Box containers were shipped to TerraCycle in New Jersey, who use them to make products such as composite decking, buckets, storage totes, and non-food-grade containers and trays. Cardboard from the outer layer of the box was recycled by local processors. 0.36% 45.33% 53% 527 564
Bi-Metal Other metal containers, including Bi-Metal, were sold to scrap metal dealers in BC for metal recovery. 0.24% 75.90% 82% 176 358
2020 Total 100% 83.20% 89,976 105,461
2019 Total 87.60% 93,763 104,759